Click here and search for over 500 products and read the guarantees!      ¿Quieres español?

Site Map

To view our Credit Card Compliance Certificate Click the above Image.


$1.57 each  80 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Viagra


$1.80 each 75 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Cialis
$2.43 each 90 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Levitra

Generic Zocor
Per pill to $0.87
Generic Propecia
Per pill  to $0.57
Generic Acomplia: As low as $1.66/pill

The above "Chat" is for the leader in online pharmacies!

Subscribe to our 
Newsletter. Free!


How to Order
Secure Order Form
Contact Us

Product Information
5-HTP Library
Alpha-Lipoic Acid
Amino Acids
Books on Menopause
Cialis - Generic
Dim (Diindolylmethane)
Ephedra Ban
Erectile Dysfunction Package
First Aid
Folic Acid
Generic Drugs
Ginko Biloba
hGH-PH Complex
Horny Goat Weed
Human Sexuality
Hyaluronic Acid
LI 160 St. John's Wort
Levitra - Generic
Natural V
Niacin, Sustained Release
Passion Flower
Progesterone Cream 
Progesterone, Natural
Progesterone in Vitamin E Oil
Progesterone-Transdermal Spray
PROhGH Sport For Women
Pro Sports Creme
Sexual Dysfunction Pak-Women
Skin Fold Calipers
TransMist™-Progesterone Transdermal Spray
Valerian Extract
Viagra - Generic
Vitamin B6
Vitamin C, Time Released
Womens Libido tied to DHEA

General Information

5-HTP Update
About Pharmasan Labs
Aging: A Specific 
Apomorphine  HGH
Body Temperature & Sleep
Biological Function
Alternative Medicine
Beta Blockers
Biological Clocks
Building Muscle Mass in the Aging
Compounding Pharmacy
Coronary Heart Disease
Depression, Male
Diindolylmethane DIM
Ephedra Ban
Erectile Dysfunction 
Estrogen Dominance
Ginkgo Trees, order
Growth Hormone Stimulators
Heart Attacks and Neuro DHA
Heart Clinic, The
Herbs & Botanicals
Herbs - The American Approach
Herbs - The German Approach
Hormone Balance in the Menopausal Female
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Human Growth Hormone
Hormone Replacement Library - Women
IP-6 Inositol Hexaphosphate
IP6 Gov Report
Lukemia & HGH
Library 5-HTP
Library - HRT
Lupus & DHEA, From The FDA:
Menopause Therapy-News
Natural V Testosterone
Penis Enlargement - Facts and Fiction
Pituitary Gland
Progesterone Deficiency
Progesterone-The Real story
Sexual dysfunction-Women
Sexual Dysfunction-Men
Sleep Clinic, The
Temperature, Body & Sleep
Testosterone For Women
Testosterone & Men
Testosterone Dominance
Testosterone & Women
Testosterone, Maintaining Levels
Vitamin C, Time Released
Vitamins, Minerals & Amino Acids
Woman's Body, Image & Health
Womens Libido tied to DHEA


I INTRODUCTION  Evolution, in biology, the complex of processes by which living organisms originated on earth and have been diversified and modified through sustained changes in form and function. The earliest known fossil organisms are single-celled forms resembling modern bacteria; they date from about 3.4 billion years ago. Evolution has resulted in successive radiations of new types of organisms, many of which have become extinct, but some of which have developed into the present fauna and flora of the world. Extinction and diversification continue today.

The notion that populations of organisms can be transformed over generations into descendant populations of different kinds has been suggested repeatedly since the early recorded history of ideas (see Heredity). In various forms it was held by some schools of ancient Greek philosophy and discussed by philosophers and theologians through the succeeding ages of history, but no scientific explanations of evolutionary processes were attempted until the 18th century. The growth of natural history then led to an increasingly detailed knowledge of living and fossil organisms, and the concept of evolution attracted serious students. The most outstanding evolutionist in the early 19th century was Jean Baptiste de Lamarck, who argued that the patterns of resemblance found in various creatures arose through evolutionary modifications of a common lineage—for example, that lions, tigers, and other animals of the cat family had all descended from a catlike ancestor. Naturalists had already established that different animals are adapted to different modes of life and environmental conditions; Lamarck believed that environmental changes evoked in individual animals direct adaptive responses that could be passed on to their offspring as inheritable traits. This generalized hypothesis of evolution by acquired characteristics was not tested scientifically during Lamarck's lifetime.

A successful explanation of evolutionary processes was proposed by Charles Darwin. His most famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859), is a landmark in human understanding of nature. Pointing to variability within species, Darwin observed that while offspring inherit a resemblance to their parents, they are not identical to them. He further noted that some of the differences between offspring and parents were not due solely to the environment but were themselves often inheritable. Animal breeders, he observed, were often able to change the characteristics of domestic animals by selecting for
reproduction those individuals with the most desirable qualities—speed in racehorses, milk production in cows, trail scenting in dogs. This is change by artificial selection. Darwin reasoned that, in nature, individuals with qualities that made them better adjusted to their environments or gave them higher reproductive capacities would tend to leave more offspring; such individuals were said to have higher fitness. Because more individuals are born than survive to breed, constant winnowing of the less fit—a natural selection—should occur, leading to a population that is well adapted to the environment it inhabits. When environmental conditions change, populations require new properties to maintain their fitness. Either the survival of a sufficient number of individuals with suitable traits leads to an eventual adaptation of the population as a whole, or the population becomes extinct. Thus, according to Darwin's theory, evolution proceeds by the natural selection of well-adapted individuals over a span of many generations.

The parts of Darwin's theory that were the most difficult to test scientifically were the inferences about the heritability of traits, or characteristics, because heredity was not understood at that time. The basic rules of inheritance became known to science only at the turn of the century, when the earlier genetic work of Gregor Mendel came to light. Mendel had discovered that characteristics are transmitted across generations in discrete units, now known as genes (see Genetics) that are inherited in a statistically predictable fashion. The discovery was then made that inheritable changes in genes, termed mutations, could occur spontaneously and randomly without regard to the environment. Since mutations were seen to be the only source of genetic novelty, many geneticists believed that evolution was driven onward by the random accumulation of favorable mutational changes. Natural selection—that is, evolution directed by adaptive fitness—was reduced to a minor role by mutationists such as Hugo de Vries, Thomas Morgan, and William Bateson, whose ideas were prominent well into the 1930s.

Even while mutationism was replacing Darwinism, the leading evolutionary theory, the science of population genetics was being founded by Sewall Wright, J. B. S. Haldane, and several other geneticists, all working independently. They developed arguments to show that even when a mutation that is immediately favored appears, its subsequent spread within a population depends on such variables as the following: (1) the size of the population; (2) the length of generations; (3) the degree to which the mutation is favorable; and (4) the rate at which the same mutation reappears in descendants.

Furthermore, a given gene is favorable only under certain environmental conditions. If conditions change in space, then the gene may be favored only in a localized part of the population; if conditions change over time, the gene may become generally unfavorable. Because different individuals usually have different assortments of genes—no two humans (except identical twins) are precisely alike genetically—the total number of genes available for inheritance by the next generation can be large, constituting a vast store of genetic variability. This is called the gene pool. Sexual reproduction ensures that the genes are rearranged in each generation, a process termed recombination. When a population is stable, the gene frequency—that is, the frequency of occurrence of each gene in proportion to the total number of genes in the gene pool—remains the same, even though the genes are recombined in different ways in each individual. When the gene frequencies in the pool change in a sustained manner, evolution is occurring. Mutations provide the gene pool with a continuous supply of new genes; through the process of natural selection the gene frequencies change so that advantageous genes occur in greater proportions.

Despite the mathematical support that was developed for this view of evolution, most evolutionists adhered to the theory of evolution by random mutations until the late 1930s. At that time Theodosius Dobzhansky, in Genetics and the Origin of Species, extended the mathematical arguments with a wide range of experimental and observational evidence. For example, he demonstrated adaptive genetic changes in large populations of fruit flies as a result of controlled environmental changes. Dobzhansky proved that the facts of genetics are compatible with Darwinian natural selection, which is the chief cause of sustained changes in gene frequencies and therefore of evolutionary changes in a population's characteristics. In the ensuing decades outstanding contributions were made to the revitalized Darwinian theory of evolution from nearly all fields of biological and paleontological science.


As the new evolutionary theory became enriched from such diverse sources, it became known as the synthetic theory. Three American scientists made especially important contributions. The German-born Ernst Mayr, a zoologist, showed that new species usually arise in geographic isolation, often following a genetic "revolution" that rapidly changes the contents of their gene pools (see Species and Speciation). George Simpson, a paleontologist, showed from the fossil record that rates and modes of evolution are correlated: New kinds of organisms arise from the invasion of a new adaptive zone, usually evolving rapidly. G. Ledyard Stebbins, a botanist, showed that plants display evolutionary patterns similar to those of animals, and especially that plant evolution has demonstrated diverse adaptive responses to environmental pressures and opportunities. In addition, these biologists reviewed a broad range of genetic, ecological, and systematic evidence to show that the synthetic theory was strongly supported by observation and experiment. The theory has formed the basis of textbook accounts of evolution since the 1950s. It has also led to a renewed effort to classify organisms according to their evolutionary history. See Classification.

During the establishment of the synthetic theory of evolution, the science of heredity underwent another profound change in 1953, when James Watson and Francis Crick demonstrated the way genetic material is composed of two nucleic acids, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). Nucleic acid molecules contain genetic codes that dictate the manufacture of proteins, and the latter direct the biochemical pathways of development and metabolism in an organism. Mutations are now known to be changes in the position of a gene, or in the information coded in the gene, that can affect the function of the protein for which the gene is responsible. Natural selection can then operate to favor or suppress a particular gene according to how strongly its protein product contributes to the reproductive success of the organism. These findings have made possible the study of evolution at the molecular level, tracing the history of changes in particular genes and in gene organization.

Today evolutionary studies extend into all branches of biology. The present state of all forms of life, from bacteria to humans, has been achieved by evolution, and to study the physiology of a leech, the ecology of a seashore community, or the behavior of a hummingbird is to study features that have been achieved through evolutionary change. As Dobzhansky has said, nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.

One of the clearest examples of natural selection at work in the modern world is afforded by gene-frequency changes in carefully studied populations of the peppered moth, a species of the genus Biston found in England. These moths, originally light grayish but with a small proportion of dark-colored individuals, are eaten by birds that locate them visually. When the British countryside near cities became 
blackened by smoke from industrial processes, the lighter moths, previously well disguised against light-colored tree trunks, were easily found by birds and thus became less fit. The dark moths became common because they were more difficult to discern against the darker background. A single gene, coding for the dark color rather than the light color, was spread by means of natural selection and raised to a high frequency in industrial regions. Subsequent reduction of smoke pollution resulted in a reduction of the dark moth variety.

The light and dark moth varieties belong to the same species and interbreed freely. If pollution had continued, however, the rural moth population would have become entirely light and the industrial entirely dark. Then each population would be subject to somewhat different selective pressures because the two environments vary. In time, the dark and light populations would differ by groups of genes, with each group advantageous locally. The moth populations might eventually become incapable of interbreeding. At this point, natural selection would have caused them to diverge from a common ancestor into two species.

Populations of various species have easily become isolated in different habitats on various islands and have differentiated into new species. Island chains provide a particularly well-studied context of speciation. Darwin himself was struck by the finches of the Galápagos Islands, which radiated into 14 species, each with distinctive form and habits, following an invasion of the islands by a single species from the American mainland. In the Hawaiian Islands some 500 species of fruit flies have descended from one or two founding species in less than 10 million years; they have had a complex history of island hopping and rehopping, in the process forming isolated populations that were the start of new species.

Natural selection is not the only source of genetic change in the evolution of species. Gene frequencies may also change by the chance failure of progeny to reproduce the exact gene proportions of their parents. This is termed genetic drift and is most important in small populations, where genes may be lost from the original gene pool simply by not being represented in successive matings. Also, failure to carry the full range of genes in the parent population occurs when a few individuals migrate and found a new, isolated population, which is thus different from the very beginning; this is called the founder effect. Mutations can, of course, also change gene frequencies, but such changes occur at low rates relative to the changes brought about by the recombination of genes in offspring.

Because all the established genes in a population have been monitored for fitness by selection, newly arisen mutations are unlikely to enhance fitness unless the environment changes so as to favor the new gene activity, as in the gene for dark color in the peppered moth. Novel genes that cause large changes rarely promote fitness and are usually lethal. The genes already established by selection are carefully adjusted to one another so their biochemical effects are coordinated; a new gene with a major effect is comparable to the insertion of a chance word or rearrangement of words into a precise set of instructions. Mutations with small effects provide the basis for the genetic changes that are seen to promote fitness in experimental laboratory environments. Indeed, natural selection by a series of mutations appears to be the chief agent of evolution.

Organisms are classified in a hierarchical scheme that attempts to reflect their evolutionary relationships. Closely related species are grouped into genera, closely related genera into families, with orders, classes, phyla, and kingdoms representing the higher categories of classification. The origin of the groups of 
organims in the higher categories is called transspecific evolution. These groups differ from one another in many ways besides being reproductively isolated; phyla even differ from one another in the basic architectural plans of their bodies. At one time some evolutionists believed that the processes responsible for speciation were not adequate to account for these great differences, but today speciation and transspecific evolution are generally considered not fundamentally different.s

Because the biological environment is patchy and variable, different modes of life are required in different habitats. Seafloor mud, open ocean water, land, and air present different problems for successful adaptation; burrowing, swimming, walking, and flying are among the locomotory solutions to life in these environments. Such widely varying solutions demand the emergence of novel body structures. The key to the development of these structures is that the necessary innovations must first have appeared as adaptations to some aspect of the ancestral mode of life and then proved useful in the new mode as well. Thus, large modifications evolve over time by a series of preadaptations. For example, the lungs of air-breathing creatures evolved from an early lunglike structure developed in certain fish for gulping oxygen from the surfaces of oxygen-deprived waters. Limbs for terrestrial life evolved from the stiffened fins of fish that gained further adaptive advantages from crawling up on shore. Similarly, limb modifications that evolved to prolong gliding jumps between trees later proved advantageous in the development of wings for flight. Successful pioneering lineages radiate into a number of descendant lineages with an array of well-adapted forms, thus representing distinctive new groups of organisms. The separate vertebrate classes of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals can thus be traced to evolutionary adaptations of their early ancestors at the species level.

VIII CURRENT EVOLUTIONARY DEBATE  Although the fact of evolution is scientifically accepted as underlying modern biology, theories that concern themselves with the processes of evolution continue to be debated and refined. Much of this work involves highly sophisticated mathematical studies, as required by the complex interactions of the various elements of the modern synthesis, from gene mutations to population genetics to large-scale ecological interactions over geological time. Because understanding of the actual evolutionary events that took place over earth's long history depends largely on interpretations of an incomplete fossil record, much latitude remains for differences in such interpretations. One of the issues that is currently being debated among theorists derives from a notable fact observed in the fossil record. That is, when a new species appears in the record it usually does so abruptly and then apparently remains stable for as long as the record of that species lasts. The fossils do not seem to exhibit the slow and gradual changes that might be expected according to the modern synthesis. For this reason, in part, a number of evolutionists—most notably Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard University and Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History—have proposed a variant concept of "punctuated equilibria" for species evolution. According to this concept, species do in fact tend to remain stable for long periods of time and then to change relatively abruptly—or rather, to be replaced suddenly by newer and more successful forms. These sudden changes are the "punctuations" in the state of equilibrium that give this concept its name.

Although these proposed periods of rapid change would be abrupt only in terms of the geological time scale and would actually occur over periods of thousands of years, most evolutionists tend to consider the punctuated-equilibrium concept only another possible mode of evolutionary change that could take place along with the processes described by the modern synthesis, rather than as a supplanting model for evolution theory. The very incompleteness of the fossil record does not permit any such clear choice to be made, because the record of almost any species is highly selective over geological time. In addition, the small changes that would make up gradual evolutionary development according to the modern synthesis are themselves not necessarily of a nature that would be apparent in the fossil history of a species, however complete it might be over a given stretch of time. Fossils primarily show gross morphological changes, whereas changes taking place in genetic makeup could be extensive even though overall body structures do not reveal these shifts in populations of species.

Arguments from the known nature of small-scale evolutionary change do not, in fact, necessarily establish long-term evolutionary events, as following either the model proposed by the modern synthesis or the one proposed by punctuated equilibrium. Evolution may just as well have proceeded along both routes.

Life originated about 3.5 billion years ago, when the earth's environment was very different than it is today. Especially important was the lack of significant amounts of free oxygen in the atmosphere. Experiments 
have shown that rather complicated organic molecules, including amino acids, can arise spontaneously under conditions that are believed to simulate the earth's primitive environment. Other experiments indicate that concentration of such molecules may have led to the synthesis of complex molecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates, and eventually to interactions among these molecules. A rudimentary genetic system eventually arose and was elaborated by natural selection into the complicated mechanisms of inheritance known today. Scientists speculate that the earliest organisms fed on inorganic or organic molecules dissolved in the waters of the early earth. Later, evolution led to organisms capable of tapping chemical and solar energy sources to produce organic molecules.

Widely accepted evidence suggests that the first organisms were archaebacteria, primitive cells without nuclei. These cells may have evolved in waters with extremely high temperatures and no oxygen. Cyanobacteria, more advanced organisms, evolved from 2.5 to 3.4 billion years ago. Cyanobacteria carried out photosynthesis, a process that traps the energy of the sun and uses it to build glucose, an organic molecule, from water and carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis freed organisms from their dependence on organic molecules dissolved in water, and also released oxygen so that the atmosphere and oceans gradually became more hospitable to more advanced life forms.

Advanced cells (eukaryotes) may have evolved through the amalgamation of a number of distinct simple cell types. A large ingesting cell may have incorporated as symbionts (see Symbiosis) some small blue-green algal cells that evolved into chloroplasts (cell bodies that photosynthesize) and some tiny aerobic bacteria that evolved into mitochondria (cell bodies that release energy during respiration). Other features of advanced cells, such as their large DNA contents, may also have arisen from prokaryotic symbionts. Single-celled eukaryotes then developed complex modes of living and advanced types of reproduction that led to the appearance of multicellular plants and animals. The latter are first known from about 700 million years ago, and their appearance implies that at least moderate levels of free atmospheric oxygen and a relatively predictable supply of food plants had been achieved.

Between about 700 and 570 million years ago the basic body plans of modern animals were developed during a remarkable burst of evolutionary diversification. The earliest body fossils consist chiefly of impressions belonging to jellyfish and their allies, a rudimentary group. At about the same time, however, fossil burrows appeared, signaling the evolution of burrowing worms with considerably more advanced body structures. Then, beginning just before 570 million years ago, skeletons developed independently in a number of animal lineages. Fish arose from a wormlike lineage of early invertebrates that evolved a stiff dorsal cord and, eventually, an articulated internal skeleton that improved swimming efficiency.

In order for complex animal communities to develop, plants must first become established to support herbivore populations, which in turn may support predators and scavengers. Land plants appeared about 400 million years ago, spreading from lowland swamps as expanding greenbelts. Arthropods (some evolving into insects) and other invertebrate groups followed them onto land, and finally land vertebrates (amphibians at first) rose from freshwater fish nearly 360 million years ago. In general, the subsequent radiations of land vertebrates made them increasingly independent of water and increasingly active. Dinosaurs and mammals shared the terrestrial environment for 135 million years; dinosaurs may well have been more active, and certainly were larger, than their mammalian contemporaries, which were small and possibly nocturnal. The mammals, however, survived a wave of extinction that eliminated dinosaurs about 65 million years ago, and subsequently diversified into many of the habitats and modes of life that formerly had been dinosaurian.

Mammals among vertebrate animals and insects among invertebrates dominate the terrestrial faunas today. See also Animal Distribution; Plant Distribution.

Humans belong to an order of mammals, the primates, which existed before the dinosaurs became extinct. Early primates seem to have been tree dwelling and may have resembled squirrels in their habits. Many of the primate attributes—the short face, overlapping visual fields, grasping hands, large brains, and perhaps even alertness and curiosity—must have been acquired as arboreal adaptations. Descent from tree habitats 

to forest floors and eventually to more open country, however, was associated with the development of many of the unique features of the human primate, including erect posture and reduced canine teeth, which suggest new habits of feeding. A shift to cooperative hunting and gathering, with concomitant requirements for a high level of intelligence and social organization, accompanied the rise of the modern human species. See Human Evolution.


The history of life as inferred from the fossil record displays a wide variety of trends and patterns. Lineages may evolve slowly at one time and rapidly at another time; they may follow one pathway of change for some time only to switch to another pathway; and they may diversify rapidly at one time and then shrink under widespread extinctions.

The key to many of these patterns is the rate and nature of environmental change. Species become adapted to the environmental conditions that exist at a given time, and when change leads to new conditions, they must evolve new adaptations or become extinct (see Endangered Species). When the environment undergoes a particularly rapid or extensive change, waves of extinction occur; these are followed by waves of development of new species. The times of mass extinction are not yet well understood. Although the most famous one is that of the dinosaurs, about 65 million years ago, such events appear in the fossil record as far back as Precambrian time, when life first arose. In fact, five mass extinctions on the scale of that at the end of the age of dinosaurs are known over the past 600 million years. Some scientists also claim to have demonstrated a definite periodicity to smaller periods of mass extinction, and in particular a 26-million-year cycle of eight extinctions over the past 250 million years.

Controversy has arisen over the proposal made by some geologists that mass extinctions are related to periodic catastrophes such as the striking of the earth's surface by a large asteroid or comet. Many paleontologists and evolutionary theorists reject such hypotheses as unjustified; they feel that periods of mass extinctions can be accounted for by less spectacular evolutionary processes and by more earthbound events such as cycles of climatic change and volcanic activity. Whatever proposals may eventually prove true, however, it seems fairly certain that periodic waves of mass extinction do occur.

Species adapted to live in environments that are changeable in the short term have broad tolerances, which may better enable them to survive extensive changes. Human beings are uniquely adapted in that they make and use tools and devices and invent and propagate procedures that give them extended control over their environments. Humans are significantly changing the environment itself, however. The effects are most complex and cannot be predicted, and yet the likelihood is that evolutionary patterns in the future will reflect the influence of the human species. See Adaptation; Natural Selection; Sexual Selection.

For a theological interpretation of the origin of life, see Creation.


Contributed By:
James W. Valentine


For 10% discount use:
"hormone10" Pharmacy

$1.57 each  80 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Viagra

$1.80 each 75 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Cialis

$2.43 each 90 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Levitra

$1.80 each 75 tabs
Free Shipping for the best

Generic Cialis

$1.80 each 75 tabs
Free Shipping for the best

Generic Cialis
Click here for


For 10% discount use:

$1.56 each 70 tabs
Free Shipping

Generic Viagra

$1.72 each 90 pills
Free Shipping

Generic Cialis

$2.65 each 60 pills
Free Shipping

Generic Levitra

$1.72 each 90 pills
Free Shipping

Generic Cialis

$1.72 each 90 pills
Free Shipping

Generic Cialis


© 1998-2014 by The Hormone Shop, LLC.
This page was last updated on 08/19/11

This Site does not endorse any product advertised on it.

Please note that the sale of DHEA or Melatonin is not available, legally in Australia or any member nations of the
European Union (excluding the United Kingdom & Switzerland). Customers must  have a valid prescription in order to purchase
these products in Australia or any member nations of the European Union (excluding the United Kingdom & Switzerland)

Disclaimer: The Hormone Shop LLC assumes no liability, whether under a theory of contract, tort, negligence, product liability or otherwise. In no event shall The Hormone Shop LLC be liable for any direct or indirect, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or exemplary damages, or for any loss incurred due to results or comments that are reported or the use of collection materials that are supplied, or any prescriptions regardless of whether The Hormone Shop LLC knew or should have known of the possibility of such damages. Furthermore, in no event  shall The Hormone Shop LLC's total cumulative liability exceed The Hormone Shop LLC's net profit on any specific product, sample or  consultation giving rise to the liability.  The Hormone Shop LLC specifically assumes no liability incurred by any 3rd party associate and if you are reading this web site in a language other that English it has been machine translated by SYSTRAN who strives to achieve the highest possible accuracy, however no automated translation is perfect nor is it intended to replace human translators. Users should note that the quality of the source text significantly affects the translations and The Hormone Shop LLC assumes no liability for incorrect or misleading translations.  The questions and comments appearing in the "Discussion Group Forum" are strictly from unknown or unidentified sources and the reader/participant should be aware that credentials from any source are completely lacking and should be questioned.  The Hormone Shop LLC specifically assumes no liability for any comment or advice appearing in the "Discussion Forum".

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug
Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, cure, treat or prevent
any disease. If pregnant or lactating, consult a physician before using.

Notice: This information on anti-aging products  is provided for educational and nutritional purposes. Any medical procedures, dietary changes or the use of dietary supplements discussed herein should only be undertaken on the advice of a qualified medical doctor. Although listed and sold as dietary supplements these are not innocuous, inert substances; rather they can and do affect vital systems within the human body and it is for this reason that you are urged to find a medical doctor who will work with you in monitoring and maintaining your well being.

These sites are the design work of Norman Rose who can be reached at 
Products & Info
Products & Info
Erectile Dysfunction
Sexual Dysfunction-Women
Horny Goat Weed
Estro Gentle
HGH Stimulators
5-HTP Update
Home Frame
5-HTP Library
5-HTP Update
Growth Hormones
Order Form
Book Store
Prostate Cancer
FTC Crack Down
hGH-PH Complex